On the nature of our world....

Almost everyone today is aware (to a very basic degree not encompassing all the facts) of plate tectonics. The theroy is one of expansion and subduction, where tectonic plates are 'pushed' away by new land matter creation at the expansion zones (Mid-Atlantic Ridge), and land matter is 'pulled under' or subducted.

Scientists still have very few examples of subduction zones, and they cannot account for:

(a) There being more mass created at the expansion zones than are being destroyed at the subduction zone.
(b) Why/how the lithosphere subducts (submerges) into magma whose density is twice that of solid granite.


(Below is a paraphrased excerpt from Meyl's book on Scalar Waves)


The growing globe


Those who don't want to believe that the earth becomes bigger, should look at modern maps of the oceans, on which the topography of the ocean floor is shown. According to the theory of Alfred Wegener concerning the continental drift North and South America on the one hand and Europe with Africa on the other hand steadily drift apart since 200 million years. The result can be read at the atlantic ocean floor. The gaping, chequered rift zones to the right and left of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge show how the earth is torn apart.

Model of expansion
Geographers assume that at another point to the same extent continental plates are
subducted and molten. That thus has to happen in the Pacific Ocean. But the sea maps tell one just the opposite (fig. 11.2). At the ocean floor of the Pacific Ocean the same rift formations are found as in the Atlantic Ocean.




That means that America drifts away from Australia and Asia exactly as from Europe, without being crushed or molten in doing so! The only possible answer thus is: The earth grows.
The characteristic rift zones in addition are found around the Antarctic. From this the conclusion can be drawn that the 7th continent slowly is moving away, while the biggest habitable mass of land predominantly stays behind on the northern hemisphere, by Eurasia and North America forming a clip around the North Pole.
Concerning the evolution of the earth there are and were numerous approaches in various directions. Paul Dirac at his time postulated, the brightness of the sun should decrease as a result of a decrease of the gravitational constant as well. In contrast to that Astrophysicists today observe just the opposite (Ingersoll 1987). According to the hypothesis of Carey energy will transform in matter in the universe. According to the idea of Oesterle aether particles are absorbed, which make our globe grow. Also other
research scientists share the idea of the growth of the earth with him in their reports. As a geologist Oesterle cites his colleague Herzig, at the Mid-Oceanic Ridge
newly produced oceanic crust has to be consumed again at other points, because otherwise the earth would expand" and criticizes the "plate tectonicians" that they would postulate their model without physical grounds.

He gives some arguments for the correctness of the model of expansion :
a) Subduction: The already discussed missing of zones of subduction and of melting of
continental plates to the assumed extent.
b) Paleomagnetism: errors and mistakes in the hypothesis of the migration of the poles.
c) Continental depth drillings: They brought much higher temperatures in depths from
4000 meters, as expected and calculated according to models.
d) Stand of the sea water: Only if the water can spread in newly forming oceanic basins it can be explained, why the covering with water on earth continually is going back.

Here is a derevation:



My take

This is very very interesting indeed! It implies that over 200 million years ago there were no oceans...just shallow seas, which if true debunks the theory that life originated in the oceans.

If this is true, then there is no need to distort the continents, and twist the plates they sit on around in order to fit them together on the pangeal land mass which floated around in one vast ocean.

I leave you with this: